Most Ethiopians were asleep when at about 2 a.m. local time Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed announced that he had ordered military action against his archrival the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF). TPLF is the ruling party in Tigray, one of the 10 federal member states that make up Ethiopia.
The timing was impeccable. The military offensive commenced as much of the world’s attention remained focused on a nail-biting election in the United States. “Our Defense Forces, under the command of the Command Post, have been ordered to carry out their mission to save the country,” Abiy said in a Facebook post. “The last red line has been crossed and the federal government is therefore forced into a military confrontation.”
The statement alleged that Tigray triggered the conflict by attacking federal military installations in Mekelle and Dansha towns and by attempting to rob the military’s Northern Command. Abiy called on Ethiopians “to remain calm, to be vigilant and to standby” the defense forces. A little over an hour later, he appeared on state television, accusing TPLF, whom he called traitors, of treason and suggesting that the military had sustained death and injuries in the ensuing confrontation. The TPLF said in a statement that the Northern Command had defected to its side and the army would stand with the people of Tigray.
The military campaign itself is hardly a surprise. Large-scale troop movements had been reported in recent days. Tigrayan officials and eyewitnesses said troops were being mobilized along the Tigray-Amhara border. On Sunday, Tigray regional president Debretsion Gebremichael declared that his forces were prepared to win an imminent conflict.
Here is what we know so far:
* The Council of Ministers has declared a six-month state of emergency in Tigray to be overseen by the chief of staff of the armed forces. A State of Emergency Task Force set up to implement the martial law could expand or restrict the geographic scope of the decree through a directive.
* Redwan Hussein, a State Minister at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ethiopia’s ambassador to Eritrea (2018-January 2020), has been named the spokesperson for the Task Force.
* Authorities had shut down telephone and internet services in the Tigray region, with many on social media saying they could not reach their families. Located in the northeast of the country, along the Eritrean border, Tigray comprises about six percent of Ethiopia’s 110 million people. TPLF fought 17-year guerrilla warfare against the Ethiopian state, toppling Mengistu Hailemariam’s communist regime in 1991.
* The Ethiopian army has four regional commands. The Northern Command, based in Mekelle, the capital of Tigray regional state, is by far the most well-equipped unit, controlling much of the country’s state of the art military hardware. Among its contingents are those who have been stationed along the Eritrean border for the past two decades.
* Abiy was appointed prime minister in April 2018. His elevation ended TPLF’s dominance over Ethiopian politics that lasted from 1991 to 2018. TPLF returned to Tigray to consolidate the power of the regional government.
* TPLF actively opposed Abiy’s candidacy in internal party deliberations and did not vote for him. The feeling of intense dislike and suspicion is mutual. As soon as he assumed office, Abiy took steps to dislodge Tigrayans from key security and government institutions. Authorities also launched a coordinated propaganda campaign against Abiy’s nemesis, blaming the latter for instigating ethnic conflict across the country. At one point Abiy disparaged TPLF as “day-time hyenas,” which became a colloquial term to demonize all Tigrayans. TPLF has similarly questioned Abiy’s mental state and its officials have been trading barbs and insults.
* Suffice to say, tensions and brinkmanship between Abiy and TPLF had been building for the better part of Abiy’s short tenure. Relations soured in September when TPLF defied federal authorities and went ahead with regional elections. Abiy said the poll was illegal and void, likening it to “squatter housing.” He then demonetized banknotes and withheld federal subsidies for the Tigray state.
* In response, TPLF said it would not recognize or cooperate with the Abiy administration starting on 5 October 2020 and deemed the government in Addis Ababa illegitimate. Crucially, TPLF prevented personnel changes at the Northern Command, refusing to allow the General appointed by Abiy to lead that division to take up his post.
* TPLF has relatively well-trained and better-armed police, special forces, and militias. If true, the defection of the Northern Command does not bode well for the unity of the national army and the country’s future.
* Tigrayans are generally battle-hardened with a long history of rebellion and TPLF spent the last two years beating the war-drum. It has created an existential siege mentality whereby civilians, especially the youth, could easily be mobilized in a protracted conflict.
* The Abiy-TPLF war could engulf the Horn region. European Union, African Union, and the United Nations have all appealed for calm and de-escalation in recent days. “All parties, as well as Ethiopia’s neighbors, must act to reduce tension, eliminate inflammatory language and abstain from provocative military deployments,” EU High Representative Josep Borrell said in a statement on Monday. “Failure to do so risks destabilizing the country as well as the wider region.” Neither side has heeded calls to de-escalate inflammatory rhetoric and return to dialogue.
* TPLF and the Eritrean government have been engaged in a war of words. In a statement on 31 October, the Eritrean embassy in Addis Ababa warned the TPLF that it was “game over” for them. This led many to conclude that the conflict in the Tigray state is likely to involve Eritrea with Asmara intervening militarily in support of Abiy. In a preemptive gesture, the Ethiopian Prime Minister’s office said TPLF has been manufacturing Eritrean military uniforms to create the impression of foreign aggression.
* Analysts say there are three centers involved in the war: Addis Ababa, Mekelle, and Asmara. And that the Eritrean government is not a neutral observer but rather a party to this conflict, although the degree of its involvement is yet to be known.
* Eritrea’s involvement in support of the federal government is likely to divide opinion among Abiy’s rapidly diminishing constituency. The personal relationship between Abiy and Eritrean President Isias Afeworki has already ruffled the feathers of reactionary Ethiopian nationalists who still bemoan Eritrea’s independence. The much-celebrated rapprochement with Eritrea, for which Abiy received the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize, is also at stake. Without the cooperation of the Tigray government, which shares a large border with Eritrea and controls the disputed territories between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the rapprochement with Eritrea cannot work.
* Ultimately, the Abiy-TPLF war is unlikely to be a quick and “surgical operation” similar to Abiy’s 2018 intervention in the Somali region. The Amhara branch of the Prosperity Party has demanded the total annihilation of the TPLF. PM Abiy in his televised statement also appeared to hint at this as the ultimate goal of the military campaign. Later in the day, Redwan Hussein tried to clarify the target of the military operation, saying the conflict was with a “small clique” inside TPLF.
* Regardless, this is likely to be a protracted conflict with possible pocketed violence and general insecurity elsewhere in the country. The situation is particularly tense in Oromia where authorities accuse TPLF of fomenting targeted ethnic attacks. Federal and Oromia officials were quick to point fingers at TPLF earlier this week when militants allegedly killed 34 civilians in West Wallaga.
Bonus:
Ethiopia analyst Rene Lefort, who maintains relations with some TPLF hardliners, offers an optimistic view that the conflict “will not lead to a full-fledged war” and negotiation or mediation could commence soon, “under the guise of ‘saving peace,’ ‘Ethiopian unity,’ ‘international pressures,’ etc.”
Just what is at stake in this conflict?
Kjetil Tronvoll, a professor of Peace and conflict studies at the Bjorknes University College in Norway and who in September went to Tigray to observer of the regional election explains via The Africa Report:
“For TPLF, and the majority of the Tigrayan people, this is an existential issue; something they have fought and sacrificed for during 17 years of struggle. The new policies of [the ruling Prosperity Party] seem to challenge this understanding of what Ethiopia ‘should be’”.
“Hence, this is not a conflict over technicalities but on the conceptualization to Ethiopia as such and which consequently makes it very hard, if not impossible to solve on the negotiation table.”
The war in Tigray is only* in part about TPLF. It is most importantly about the future of multinational federalism, and what kind of system will reign in Ethiopia from here on. It is a mistake to miss this broader picture informing Abiy’s calculations.
— Ayantu Ayana👩🏾🏫👩🏾💻 (@ThaAyantu) November 4, 2020
1. There is no disputed border b/n Eritrea and Ethiopia!
2. The border is virtually demarcated through a FINAL and BINDING decision.
3. What we have is the ILLEGAL occupation of soverign Eritrean territories by the TPLF.
[…] is important to note here that TPLF deliberately escalated the tension after the 5 October because they recognized that Abiy and his government are at their most vulnerable after the expiry […]
[…] Some of the prime minister’s surrogates do not even hide PP’s ultimate objective. For example, earlier this year, Abiy’s senior advisor Daniel Kibret underscored that the main task of PP is to finish the nation-building process initiated by Menelik II. So far, neither the party nor the prime minister has denounced and distanced themselves from that outrageous remark. It could only be interpreted as tacit approval of the statement. Abiy’s latest speech is thus in keeping with the deliberate effort to slowly but surely chip away at the federal project. It is under this context that Abiy and TPLF are now engaged in an omnious conflict that could destablize the entire Horn of Africa. […]
[…] Some of the prime minister’s surrogates do not even hide PP’s ultimate objective. For example, earlier this year, Abiy’s senior advisor Daniel Kibret underscored that the main task of PP is to finish the nation-building process initiated by Menelik II. So far, neither the party nor the prime minister has denounced and distanced themselves from that outrageous remark. It could only be interpreted as tacit approval of the statement. Abiy’s latest speech is thus in keeping with the deliberate effort to slowly but surely chip away at the federal project. It is under this context that Abiy and TPLF are now engaged in an omnious conflict that could destablize the entire Horn of Africa. […]